When will it eventually stop?
After a jarring week that rattled financial middles from New York to Hong Kong, and wiped out almost$ 5 trillion from stock markets, it’s the question everyone is trying to figure out.
Despite the rebound on Friday, U.S. equities shut out their worst week in two years. The S& P 500 Index, which roared from one record to the next in recent months on strong earnings and a big corporate windfall from the Trump tax rewrite, is down virtually 9 percent from its high in late January. S& P 500 futures rose 0.3 percentage in Sunday trading.
Whether the downdraft goes down in history as a mere hiccup, or spells the end to one of the longest bull markets in recent remembrance is, of course, anyone’s guess. But in just a few short periods, the breathtaking volatility that shattered the market soothe has investors clambering to make sense of it all.
Across Wall Street, analysts are nearly unanimous: the U.S. economy is humming along and corporate profits seem robust, so equities, regardless of the near-term correction, are a buy. Yet valuations paint a more somber illustration, and one that indicates there’s still room to fall before stocks find their footing.
” There is a’ macro storey’ — in that the run of macro data is still strong ,” said Inigo Fraser-Jenkins, who contributes Sanford C. Bernstein’s world quantitative strategy squad.” What we do not have is a valuation floor .”
One such indicator is called the Fed model. It compares the relative value of equities to fixed income. Running by that, the message isn’t reassuring. Even after the rout, the math shows the S& P 500 remains less attractive than it has been 82 percentage of the time since the indicator bottomed in 2009 when compared with yields on U.S. Treasuries.
Currently, the S& P 500′ s earnings crop is around 6 percent, 3.1 percentage points more than the 10 -year note. The post-crisis average has been 4 points.
It’s part of the reason the sorenes has been so pronounced.
Whatever ultimately triggered the selloff — and just about everything from worries about inflation to forced selling by monies involved in arcane volatility trades has been implicated — inventories were sailing along at extreme levels of optimism before it all fell apart. Sure, earnings, hiring and consumer confidence were rising — but inventory costs had risen more.
So far, the S& P 500 has tumbled in seven of the 10 past days, and plunged into a correction( loosely defined as a 10 percentage plummet) faster than any time since 1950. In doing so, the index has blown through three round-number milestones, as well as technical support degrees indicated by its 50 -, 100 – and( briefly) 200 -day moving medians. The sheer hasten of the selloff has challenged the buy-the-dip advice offered by firms from JPMorgan to Goldman Sachs.
There’s no obvious reason to assume one correction will be like another. But judging by recent experience, this one may have farther to go.
At 16.8 times forecast earnings, the S& P 500′ s valuation multiple is now down from a high of 20 in late December. That’s one of the most wonderful wanes since 2009, but it has yet to bring P/ Es in line with the average ratio of 15. 5 that recognized the bottom of the last two corrections. To get there, the S& P 500 would have to fall to 2,417. That’s roughly 8 percent below Friday’s closing level.
To Barry Bannister, chief equity strategist at Stifel Nicolaus& Co ., the haywire market is a product of investors repricing health risks of higher bond harvests and inflation. Those have largely been missing in the past nine years, which let the S& P 500′ s valuation reach levels not understood since the dot-com bubble.
Now that 10 -year Treasury harvests have started to rise, equity P/ E ratios need to come down to stay attractive.
” The entire edifice of the central bank bubble is built on repressed bond crops and artificially low cost of capital with both governments race to the bottom for global corporate tax rates, all of which has inflated EPS and artificially supported P/ E ,” he said.” That is early in the process of terminating .”
Stocks still seem inexpensive to Treasuries when viewed from a wider lens. The current crop spread is more than doubled the average since 1990 and compares with 2.66 percentage points since 2000. But a rise in 10 -year yields to only 3.65 percent( from about 2.85 percent now) would reduce the equity advantage to the 20 -year average.
Other indicators also propose stocks offer decent value. Thanks to analyst earnings upgrades, additional measures known as the PEG ratio — which takes into account future growing — just fell below its historic average for the first time since 2012, according to Yardeni Research data that goes back to 1985.
That’s not enough to convince James Investment Research’s Brian Culpepper to warm up to inventories. His funds have been cutting comprises this year.
” Stocks are extremely expensive ,” he said.
Forgot your password?
Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.